Skip to main content

Public Data Insights

Open data, analyzed in the open

Free, source-cited scorecards built from open public datasets. Each one fuses multiple federal sources into a decision-ready view for government and civic teams, and demonstrates the production data work KYFEX delivers.

Ask the data

Ask a plain-language question about the published county figures and get an answer grounded in the data, with the source for every number. Coverage is California, Mississippi, and Texas primary-care access measures, for example: how does diabetes prevalence compare across a state's counties, or what drives a county's priority index.

Sample answer

What is the diabetes rate in Holmes County, Mississippi?

In Holmes County, Mississippi, diagnosed diabetes prevalence is 23.3% (CDC PLACES, 2025 release, measure year 2023). Every figure is taken from the published scorecard and shows its source.

See the data

Every county in California, plotted from the same open data behind the scorecards. Hover any point for its name, or open the table under each chart for the full figures.

Priority across the state

Each county shaded by its primary-care priority index, darkest where combined need is highest.

Alameda: 38.0Alpine: 31.5Amador: 42.0Butte: 46.7Calaveras: 48.2Colusa: 57.5Contra Costa: 41.7Del Norte: 55.7El Dorado: 39.1Fresno: 70.3Glenn: 54.4Humboldt: 53.5Imperial: 77.9Inyo: 45.9Kern: 70.2Kings: 64.4Lake: 60.7Lassen: 57.6Los Angeles: 54.5Madera: 67.4Marin: 33.7Mariposa: 52.9Mendocino: 56.1Merced: 69.5Modoc: 60.9Mono: 35.1Monterey: 58.1Napa: 43.3Nevada: 41.0Orange: 40.1Placer: 32.7Plumas: 52.0Riverside: 55.4Sacramento: 46.7San Benito: 49.1San Bernardino: 56.9San Diego: 40.2San Francisco: 31.7San Joaquin: 53.0San Luis Obispo: 37.7San Mateo: 19.1Santa Barbara: 46.6Santa Clara: 26.3Santa Cruz: 36.7Shasta: 47.2Sierra: 56.7Siskiyou: 57.9Solano: 46.7Sonoma: 40.8Stanislaus: 53.6Sutter: 55.0Tehama: 56.3Trinity: 63.3Tulare: 70.1Tuolumne: 45.3Ventura: 41.8Yolo: 40.3Yuba: 52.3
LowerHigher

Shading is the within-state priority index. Scorecards are not comparable across states.

Show as table
CountyValue
Imperial77.9
Fresno70.3
Kern70.2
Tulare70.1
Merced69.5
Madera67.4
Kings64.4
Trinity63.3
Modoc60.9
Lake60.7
Monterey58.1
Siskiyou57.9
Lassen57.6
Colusa57.5
San Bernardino56.9
Sierra56.7
Tehama56.3
Mendocino56.1
Del Norte55.7
Riverside55.4
Sutter55.0
Los Angeles54.5
Glenn54.4
Stanislaus53.6
Humboldt53.5
San Joaquin53.0
Mariposa52.9
Yuba52.3
Plumas52.0
San Benito49.1
Calaveras48.2
Shasta47.2
Butte46.7
Sacramento46.7
Solano46.7
Santa Barbara46.6
Inyo45.9
Tuolumne45.3
Napa43.3
Amador42.0
Ventura41.8
Contra Costa41.7
Nevada41.0
Sonoma40.8
Yolo40.3
San Diego40.2
Orange40.1
El Dorado39.1
Alameda38.0
San Luis Obispo37.7
Santa Cruz36.7
Mono35.1
Marin33.7
Placer32.7
San Francisco31.7
Alpine31.5
Santa Clara26.3
San Mateo19.1

Health burden vs access barriers

Each dot is a county. Right means higher chronic-disease burden, up means more access and social barriers, and bigger dots are more populous. Counties toward the top right carry the most combined need.

Highest combined need02550751000255075100Los Angeles: Health burden 38, Access barriers 45San Diego: Health burden 19, Access barriers 25Orange: Health burden 26, Access barriers 21Riverside: Health burden 52, Access barriers 41San Bernardino: Health burden 47, Access barriers 51Santa Clara: Health burden 8, Access barriers 10Alameda: Health burden 17, Access barriers 20Sacramento: Health burden 36, Access barriers 31Contra Costa: Health burden 28, Access barriers 17Fresno: Health burden 57, Access barriers 62Kern: Health burden 60, Access barriers 70Ventura: Health burden 32, Access barriers 24San Francisco: Health burden 5, Access barriers 28San Joaquin: Health burden 42, Access barriers 44San Mateo: Health burden 15, Access barriers 8Stanislaus: Health burden 52, Access barriers 47Sonoma: Health burden 30, Access barriers 16Tulare: Health burden 60, Access barriers 70Solano: Health burden 40, Access barriers 27Santa Barbara: Health burden 33, Access barriers 38Monterey: Health burden 49, Access barriers 49Placer: Health burden 25, Access barriers 4Merced: Health burden 57, Access barriers 74San Luis Obispo: Health burden 28, Access barriers 20Santa Cruz: Health burden 27, Access barriers 22Marin: Health burden 21, Access barriers 3Yolo: Health burden 16, Access barriers 36Butte: Health burden 38, Access barriers 37El Dorado: Health burden 34, Access barriers 7Shasta: Health burden 48, Access barriers 24Imperial: Health burden 72, Access barriers 85Madera: Health burden 68, Access barriers 73Kings: Health burden 52, Access barriers 69Humboldt: Health burden 46, Access barriers 38Napa: Health burden 37, Access barriers 20Nevada: Health burden 44, Access barriers 10Sutter: Health burden 52, Access barriers 44Mendocino: Health burden 64, Access barriers 38Yuba: Health burden 42, Access barriers 46San Benito: Health burden 37, Access barriers 34Lake: Health burden 73, Access barriers 40Tehama: Health burden 63, Access barriers 41Tuolumne: Health burden 50, Access barriers 17Calaveras: Health burden 60, Access barriers 19Siskiyou: Health burden 70, Access barriers 31Amador: Health burden 49, Access barriers 12Lassen: Health burden 54, Access barriers 42Glenn: Health burden 55, Access barriers 43Del Norte: Health burden 57, Access barriers 33Colusa: Health burden 61, Access barriers 54Plumas: Health burden 65, Access barriers 14Inyo: Health burden 48, Access barriers 21Mariposa: Health burden 63, Access barriers 22Trinity: Health burden 91, Access barriers 33Mono: Health burden 35, Access barriers 21Modoc: Health burden 80, Access barriers 38Sierra: Health burden 83, Access barriers 25Alpine: Health burden 41, Access barriers 15Health burdenAccess barriers
  • Health burden
  • Access barriers
  • Provider shortage
Show as table
CountyBurdenAccessPopulationTop driver
Los Angeles38.144.79,663,345Provider shortage
San Diego19.024.63,269,973Provider shortage
Orange25.921.43,135,755Provider shortage
Riverside52.240.92,492,442Provider shortage
San Bernardino46.950.62,195,611Provider shortage
Santa Clara7.89.61,877,592Provider shortage
Alameda16.720.31,622,188Provider shortage
Sacramento35.631.41,584,288Provider shortage
Contra Costa27.816.61,155,025Provider shortage
Fresno56.661.91,017,162Provider shortage
Kern59.770.1913,820Provider shortage
Ventura32.124.2829,590Provider shortage
San Francisco5.428.3808,988Provider shortage
San Joaquin42.343.7800,965Provider shortage
San Mateo14.87.8726,353Provider shortage
Stanislaus52.247.2551,430Provider shortage
Sonoma29.815.8481,812Provider shortage
Tulare59.670.0479,468Provider shortage
Solano40.226.8449,218Provider shortage
Santa Barbara32.837.7441,257Provider shortage
Monterey48.648.9430,723Provider shortage
Placer24.54.3423,561Provider shortage
Merced57.374.3291,920Provider shortage
San Luis Obispo27.919.7281,639Provider shortage
Santa Cruz26.622.0261,547Provider shortage
Marin21.22.9254,407Provider shortage
Yolo15.935.8220,544Provider shortage
Butte37.936.8207,172Provider shortage
El Dorado33.86.7192,215Provider shortage
Shasta48.224.2180,366Provider shortage
Imperial72.084.8179,057Access barriers
Madera67.972.9162,858Access barriers
Kings51.668.5152,682Provider shortage
Humboldt45.937.6133,985Provider shortage
Napa37.019.8133,216Provider shortage
Nevada44.39.6102,037Provider shortage
Sutter51.644.397,948Provider shortage
Mendocino64.438.489,108Provider shortage
Yuba42.245.585,722Provider shortage
San Benito36.933.568,175Provider shortage
Lake73.339.767,878Health burden
Tehama62.740.964,896Provider shortage
Tuolumne50.116.654,204Provider shortage
Calaveras59.919.246,565Provider shortage
Siskiyou69.930.742,905Provider shortage
Amador49.011.741,811Provider shortage
Lassen53.642.228,861Provider shortage
Glenn54.743.028,129Provider shortage
Del Norte57.233.126,589Provider shortage
Colusa61.053.922,037Health burden
Plumas64.814.319,131Provider shortage
Inyo48.120.518,527Provider shortage
Mariposa63.322.416,919Provider shortage
Trinity91.233.415,670Health burden
Mono34.820.513,066Provider shortage
Modoc79.637.88,500Health burden
Sierra83.425.13,200Health burden
Alpine41.414.61,141Health burden

Diabetes prevalence across counties

How diagnosed-diabetes prevalence is spread across 58 counties. The dashed line marks the median.

9.3% - 10.0%: 210.0% - 10.6%: 810.6% - 11.3%: 611.3% - 11.9%: 1311.9% - 12.6%: 1112.6% - 13.3%: 613.3% - 13.9%: 713.9% - 14.6%: 114.6% - 15.2%: 215.2% - 15.9%: 2Median 12.0%10%11%12%13%14%15%
Show as table
RangeCounties
9.3% - 10.0%2
10.0% - 10.6%8
10.6% - 11.3%6
11.3% - 11.9%13
11.9% - 12.6%11
12.6% - 13.3%6
13.3% - 13.9%7
13.9% - 14.6%1
14.6% - 15.2%2
15.2% - 15.9%2

Where it's heading

Diagnosed diabetes in Imperial, California: five observed years and a three-year projection.

14.5%15%15.5%16%16.5%2019: 14.6% (Observed)2020: 14.7% (Observed)2021: 15.2% (Observed)2022: 15.4% (Observed)2023: 15% (Observed)2024: 15.4% (14.8% to 16.1%)2025: 15.6% (14.8% to 16.3%)2026: 15.7% (14.9% to 16.6%)20192021202320252026
  • Observed
  • Projected (80% interval)
Show as table
YearTypeValueLowHigh
2019Observed14.6%--
2020Observed14.7%--
2021Observed15.2%--
2022Observed15.4%--
2023Observed15%--
2024Projected (80% interval)15.4%14.8%16.1%
2025Projected (80% interval)15.6%14.8%16.3%
2026Projected (80% interval)15.7%14.9%16.6%

Projection, not prediction. The shaded band is an 80% prediction interval from a trend fit to five years, and it widens further out. Only measures that passed a hold-out backtest are projected.

Explore county-level primary-care access and health-burden indices built from open federal data. Use the filters to compare states, scan the featured priority counties, or open a full scorecard for methodology and complete tables.

State landing pages

Indexable per-state views with pre-rendered rankings and charts (MS, CA, TX today).

Scorecard proof pages

Highest priority counties (featured cut)

Top counties by combined targeting-priority index across all published state scorecards. Rankings are relative within each state, not comparable across states.

RankCountyStatePriority indexTop driver
1HolmesMS90.0Provider shortage
2HumphreysMS86.7Health burden
1DimmitTX85.2Access & SDOH barriers
3SharkeyMS84.0Health burden
4QuitmanMS83.6Provider shortage
5TunicaMS82.8Provider shortage
6CoahomaMS82.2Provider shortage
7JeffersonMS79.7Provider shortage
2Jim HoggTX79.0Provider shortage
1ImperialCA77.9Access & SDOH barriers
3BrooksTX77.8Provider shortage
8ClaiborneMS77.2Provider shortage
4ZapataTX77.0Access & SDOH barriers
5StarrTX76.8Access & SDOH barriers
9WashingtonMS76.3Provider shortage

Top counties in MS

Bar chart of the highest-priority counties in the first matching jurisdiction for the current filter (hand-rolled SVG; table fallback below).

Holmes90.0Humphreys86.7Sharkey84.0Quitman83.6Tunica82.8Coahoma82.2Jefferson79.7Claiborne77.2

Download data artifacts

Committed JSON and CSV files synced to static hosting. Use for analysis, citation, or integration; same URLs appear in Dataset JSON-LD.

Open datasets in this collection

  • CDC PLACES — Local Data for Better Health (County Data)

    PLACES 2025 release (measure year 2023)

  • HRSA — Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas

    HRSA Primary Care HPSA detail (designated)

  • U.S. Census Bureau — American Community Survey (5-year)

    ACS 2019-2023 5-year estimates

Explore by jurisdiction

MS · 82 counties

Mississippi County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Mississippi, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 82 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

View scorecard

TX · 254 counties

Texas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Texas, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 254 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

View scorecard

CA · 58 counties

California County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for California, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 58 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

View scorecard

Need this analysis for your program or state?

We fuse open public data with your claims, workforce, and program data for custom dashboards and governed analytics. Talk to KYFEX about a scoped engagement.

Dashboard data last generated June 3, 2026.

Subscribe

AI engineering insights. No spam.